Olando K3-2 vs Other Brands: The Practical Choice for GMP Lines

When selecting a laser tablet drilling system for osmotic tablets (e.g., Metformin, Nifedipine), real-world performance beats brochure numbers. This article compares our Olando K3-2 with other international brand solutions from the angles that matter most on a GMP floor: operation, cleaning, throughput, compliance, total cost, and service response.

---

Why this comparison matters

• More than peak speed: Operators, cleaning/changeover, compliance, and response time drive OEE and time-to-validation.
• GMP realities: Space is tight; digital records must pass audits. A compact, Part 11–ready system starts up faster.
• ROI focus: If your target is up to 100k–120k tablets/hour, the right balance of usability and cost wins.

---

Key Differences at a Glance

Dimension	Olando K3-2	Other International Brands	What it means on the line
Operation	Simple HMI, quick parameter recall; fast start/stop	Often more steps and deeper menus	Shorter training & fewer operator errors
Cleaning & Changeover	Dual-ring rotary transport, compact path; easier daily cleaning & batch change	Linear conveyor & longer footprint mean larger cleaning coverage	Faster changeover = higher effective throughput (OEE)
Throughput	Up to 120,000 tablets/hour	Some brands advertise up to ~140,000/h	Both cover 100k–120k/h targets; others may edge higher on peak
Compliance	21 CFR Part 11–ready: user access, e-signatures, audit trail; IQ/OQ documentation available	Typically similar claims	Audit-ready data integrity for regulated markets
Footprint	Compact layout thanks to dual-ring transport	Longer linear lines	Better space utilization in GMP rooms
Total Cost & ROI	More competitive overall budget at comparable configurations; target ≤ 3-month delivery with on-site install & training	Higher overall investment is common	Faster ramp-up and payback
Service Response	< 24-hour response (remote/on-site coordination)	Often longer response times (customers commonly report ~2 days)	Lower downtime risk at a critical process node

---

What both classes can do

• Dual-camera inspection with reject mechanisms for defective tablets.
• GMP-aligned digital records and support for 21 CFR Part 11 features.
• Commercial-scale deployment in osmotic tablet production.

---

Selection guidance

• Space-constrained GMP rooms, fast start-up, and easy maintenance: K3-2’s compact, dual-ring design and quick cleaning/changeover are highly advantageous.
• Pursuing absolute peak speed: Some international brands may publish a slightly higher ceiling; weigh footprint, budget, and response time trade-offs.
• Audit-led projects: Request Part 11 features (user roles, e-signatures, audit trail) and IQ/OQ templates from any vendor—K3-2 provides both.

---

Engineering highlights (K3-2)

• Transport: Dual-ring rotary tablet transport for compact footprint and stable high throughput.
• Vision & Lighting: Cognex vision, CCS lighting; real-time inspection and reject.
• Control: Linux-based upper system; PLC options include Panasonic or Siemens upon request.
• Compliance: 21 CFR Part 11 support (user access control, electronic signatures, audit trail); IQ/OQ documentation available.
• Support: On-site international installation and 1-week training; < 24-hour support response.

---

Procurement & validation checklist

1. Part 11: user roles, e-signature, audit trail; sample logs/screenshots.
2. IQ/OQ package readiness; SOPs and training materials.
3. Cleaning/changeover: dead-spot access, typical time for size/recipe change.
4. Throughput target: stable 100k–120k/h or chasing higher peak?
5. MES/EBR connectivity and export formats for traceability.
6. Service SLA: response time, spare parts lead time, preventive maintenance plan.

---

See the machine

Product page: Olando K3-2 Pharmaceutical Laser Drilling System

---

Conclusion

If your goal is a validated, stable 100k–120k/h line with faster start-up, the combination of simpler operation, easier cleaning/changeover, compact footprint, Part 11 readiness, and a more competitive overall budget makes K3-2 a practical choice. Add the < 24-hour response time, and your risk of prolonged downtime at this critical process node goes down significantly.