How ODF Drying Methods Impact Thickness and Quality
Share
In industrial oral dissolvable film (ODF) manufacturing, many teams focus on formulation, coating accuracy or cutting and packaging – while underestimating how decisive the drying step is for final quality.
In real projects, issues such as “uneven thickness”, “dose variation per unit area” and “large batch-to-batch differences” often do not come from the formula itself, but from what happens during drying: when the film is still a wet layer, its structure is disturbed by airflow and tension before it has a chance to set.
ODF drying is not simply about “removing water or solvent”. It is the process that transforms a liquid coating into a stable, solid film. Whether the drying method respects the physical properties of the wet film directly determines:
- whether the film surface remains stable,
- whether thickness is controllable and uniform,
- whether quality control is truly repeatable,
- and whether scale-up still depends on heavy manual “fine tuning”.
This article looks at the mechanism behind drying and compares vertical oven-style airflow with parallel hot-air drying, explaining how each affects ODF thickness uniformity and quality stability.
Why the “Wet-Film Stage” Is So Sensitive
Immediately after coating, an ODF “film” is not really a film. It behaves much more like a thin, highly mobile liquid layer:
- solid content has not yet formed a stable skeleton,
- surface tension and viscoelasticity change quickly with temperature and solvent content,
- the layer is thin and mechanically weak, with low resistance to disturbance,
- any external force can easily be amplified into visible defects or invisible thickness variation.
For this stage, the key is not how “strong” the heating is, but whether the system can allow solvent to migrate and evaporate in a controlled way, without destroying the wet-film structure. For ODF, stability is more important than pushing the absolute drying speed to the limit.
Vertical Oven-Style Airflow: Intuitive Efficiency, Structural Risk
On some ODF lines you can still see drying sections that resemble traditional coating ovens, with vertical airflow directed towards the film surface and exhaust pulling vapours away. This structure may work well for thick coatings, strong substrates or highly robust materials – but for ODF it often exposes systematic problems.
1. Wet Film Is Easily Disturbed, Leading to Uneven Thickness
Before the film is set, ODF wet layers can be disturbed by vertical airflow:
- local areas are lifted, rippled or wrinkled,
- the coating locally “re-distributes” at a microscopic level,
- differences in drying rate between edges and centre are amplified.
The result is often:
- non-uniform film thickness across the web,
- once dried, the system simply “locks in” these non-uniformities – they cannot be repaired by further heating.
2. Quality Control Becomes Harder – Variation Is Built into the Process
Thickness variation directly impacts unit dose per area and batch consistency. Even if downstream measurement systems are sophisticated, they can only detect variation, not remove what has already been created in the process itself. Typical symptoms include:
- QC sees variability that cannot be explained by formulation changes,
- the acceptable parameter window for drying becomes extremely narrow,
- batch-to-batch consistency depends heavily on skilled operators “holding” the process.
3. Trials and Scale-Up Depend on Heavy Manual Fine-Tuning
When vertical airflow keeps disturbing the wet film, teams on site often resort to a series of “rescue actions”:
- repeatedly adjusting fan speed, air volume and exhaust rates,
- modifying line speed, tension and roller strategies,
- trying to find a temporary “sweet spot” where the system seems stable.
This leads to very tangible costs:
- trial periods are prolonged due to repeated trial-and-error,
- engineering know-how becomes personal and difficult to transfer,
- scale-up risk increases – what works at small scale does not guarantee robust commercial performance.
Parallel Hot-Air Drying: Building Stability into the Design
In contrast to vertical airflow, parallel hot-air drying aligns the main air movement with the web direction. The film is dried by more gentle, more continuous convective heat transfer along the web rather than by direct impact.
For ODF, the key benefit of this concept is not “faster” drying, but more stable drying.
1. Minimising Disturbance, Keeping the Wet Film Intact
Because parallel airflow exerts much less vertical impact on the wet layer, the film is less likely to:
- be blown up or “flapped” before it sets,
- develop micro-wrinkles or local pooling,
- accumulate thickness variation that later becomes frozen into the dry film.
By reducing structural disturbance at the earliest stage, the system prevents thickness variation from forming in the first place.
2. Thickness Uniformity Emerges Naturally, with Higher Repeatability
When the film structure remains more stable, thickness uniformity depends less on “heroic parameter tuning” and more on the inherent design of the drying module. For ODF quality control, this means:
- a clearer, wider process window,
- more controllable batch-to-batch variation,
- quality indicators that can be maintained over time without constant firefighting.
3. Less Manual Intervention, More Reproducible Engineering
In practice, parallel hot-air drying allows engineering teams to:
- spend less effort “pushing down” process noise caused by airflow,
- carry over the same parameter logic from trials to scale-up,
- reduce dependence on individual operator experience for stable production.
Combined with a well-designed hot-air tunnel – for example using a natural temperature gradient along the line as described in HUANGHAI’s patent-based concepts – drying stability becomes an integrated feature of the line. For more on gradient hot-air drying, see HUANGHAI’s article on ODF drying, yield and stability .
Why “Drying Stable” Is More Important than “Drying Fast”
ODF is a typical dosage form where quality is guaranteed by process. If the drying design itself introduces instability, no amount of downstream inspection can fully compensate. At best, testing can help you reject bad product – it cannot make an unstable process fundamentally stable.
When the drying method respects the physical behaviour of the wet film:
- defects occur less frequently,
- process variation is reduced at the source,
- scale-up becomes smoother and more predictable,
- validation and ongoing manufacturing become less stressful for both production and QA.
Conclusion: Drying as a Structural Design Choice
ODF drying is not just about adding heat. It is a structural setting process that fixes the film’s thickness and internal uniformity for the rest of its lifecycle.
Vertical oven-style airflow can introduce disturbance during the wet-film stage, creating thickness non-uniformity and making quality control difficult, while increasing the need for manual fine-tuning during trials and scale-up.
Parallel hot-air drying, on the other hand, minimises destructive forces on the wet film, allowing thickness uniformity to emerge more naturally and quality to be more repeatable. For teams that want to move ODF manufacturing from “we can make it” to “we can reliably make it at scale”, the choice of drying method is often the decisive step.
If you are planning or upgrading an ODF line and want to strengthen thickness control and batch stability, HUANGHAI can help you evaluate drying concepts and configure a hot-air tunnel that matches your formulation and throughput needs.
Contact HUANGHAI to discuss ODF drying solutions and complete line configurations.